Thursday, February 14, 2019

AU REVOIR FREDO

                           THE DECADE LONG NIGHTMARE 
                       IS OVER, OR IS IT?      


   
"SIT HERE AND HOLD OUT YOUR HAND"
It will become clear, he never had your back Hastings



            Mayors are no longer elected in Hastings-on-Hudson.  They are now anointed by the Hastings-on- Hudson Democratic Committee headed by Vanessa Merton,  the "Boss Hogg" of this modern day leftist Tammany Hall.   There has not been a single representative outside the "Merton Gang" to sit on the Board of Trustees for over two decades,  the last being Trustee Anthony Gagliardi.    At a recent caucus / circle jerk,  some seventy plus progressives in attendance announced that in March,  Trustee Nicola Armacost would assume the thrown vacated by the decade long train wreck known to contributors to this page, as "Fredo" Swiderski.    Armacost,  who  was herself appointed by Swiderski to fill a vacated seat on the Board of Trustees  in 2009,  will appoint her own successor in April following her swearing in as Mayor.   Thus the progressive beat of these leftist SJW's goes on,  with Hastings now nothing more than a disturbing echo chamber.

            Following her induction,  Swiderski's "leftenant" spoke briefly to the small gathering.  She explained that she wanted to be Mayor because she was "upset by national politics."  The comment was of course mainlined by all in attendance,  as under Swiderski  the coopted Board of Trustees has become a podium for meaningless virtue signaling on national politics.   With leftists swelling with delusional pride,  Armacost continued, feeding more trite to the tribe.  'As Mayor I will rely on Trustee Marc Leaf's unique insight of the village's history and character.'   Though utter lip service,  this remark is somewhat encouraging, as it seems to imply that Armacost will preform some form of due diligence before embarking on a particular course of action.  This unlike Swiderski who arrogantly engaged  in misguided personal agendas without any real understanding of the village he represented.   Examples of "Fredo's" many disastrous "pilot programs" and embarrassing missteps have all been well documented on this page.   Ms. Armacost's reliance on Trustee Leaf's insights into Hastings history and character is of course foolishness and will serve little to no purpose.

         For the Hastings on Hudson that village Trustee Marc Leaf knew as a youth,  sadly no longer exists.   That Hastings was an actual village, devoid of group think.  One thriving with diversity and filled with unique and colorful individuals.   It was a village where children once walked to school,  not an entitled suburban community where S.U.V.'s line Lefurgy Avenue waiting to collect coddled offspring from Hillside Elementary.    Telling yourself you are what once was, does not make it so.    If the village is ever to return to any semblance of the "character" of it's former self,  this lip service must end.   For far too long Hastings has been trading on this romantic notion, which serves no one.   Trustee Leaf's memories of the former village where real men once walked it's streets and could be found in places outside the D.P.W. and volunteer fire departments, are better shared with the Hastings Historical Society.

        Thankfully there are a few engaged voices who still remain, as there are key questions that must be asked of the anointed Mayor before she assumes office.   Here are two which we feel are paramount.

1.   When was she aware of the county's proposal to fence the Warburton Avenue bridge?   A proposal that Swiderski and Village Manager Frobel withheld from residents for two years before making public.   If she too were unaware,  why did she not speak out against this abhorrent manipulation of the public, resulting in the destruction of an historic and signature view

2.  What, or whom (David Shaw), was most responsible for saving Hastings from bankruptcy?

        That said, we wish Ms. Armacost well.   She is certain to be a vast improvement,  it's hard to imagine anyone who wouldn't be.   She will bring a much needed authenticity and engagement to the proceedings,  as she replaces the most socially awkward, duplicitous and fearful Mayor ever to serve.    She will hopefully return a spine and bring some taste to the office, as Swiderski displayed neither.   No doubt she will continue to be a fiscal asset as the only board member who can dissect a budget,  much less make sense of a spread sheet.  Given this,  our hope is that Ms. Armacost's term as Mayor will reflect at least some of the following.
   
           Placing the village's day to day operations and protecting it's welfare as her top priority.
   
           Return actual transparency to the proceedings,  not just vapid references to the term.

           Restore allotted time for public comment to five minutes, from the three minutes to which it was cut by Swiderski who feared, rather than welcomed, public input.   Residents should not be hampered by a three minute restriction and or time clock when speaking.  You will find no such clocks in Dobbs Ferry or Irvington.

          Relocate meetings of the Board of Trustees from the municipal building, where the Board lords over residents from a dais,  to the Harmon Center where they can be conducted on a level playing field with the public.

          Replace or retire the mediocre at best, village manager Francis Frobel.

          Dissolve the 35 grand a year Downtown Advocate / Cheerleader.

          Gradually phase out all L.E.D. lighting from Hastings streets.
 
          Put an end to the board's endless self congratulatory back slapping.   Any and all congratulations should be left to the public.   You want to congratulate "the team," do so amongst yourselves, in private.
 
         Cease all back room rehearsals - withTrustees given talking points and discourse prior to B.O.T. discussions.   This practice on display nauseatingly  under Swiderski, was an insult to residents intelligence, turning many discussions into horribly cheap theater.

         As we prepare to turn the page,  we are encouraged by a handful of residents who have been paying attention and speaking out.    Stephen Seibert, who repeatedly challenged the lack of transparency under Swiderski, the need for real diversity in the village, and the illegal demolition of Building 51.   Gene Calamari, who exposed and challenged Swiderski's secretive plan to combine the Recreation Department with Dobbs Ferry.   Patrick Randolph Bell,  a vocal opponent of the Mayor and watchdog of village commissions.  Brian Allen, who exposed the withholding of information from the public, resulting in the monstrous fencing of the Warburton Bridge.  Kyle and Jen Mooney, who engaged the public and shed harsh light on proposed zoning changes, putting a stop to the Artis development.  And currently a relative new voice,  Lyz Perry,  who's engaging others in the on going waterfront development process.   Finally,  long time resident and Hastings legend,  John Gonder, who has long questioned the Board's ethics and their relationship / "negotiations" with B.P.   Calling out an exec at the global pariah as, "The Godfather of Hastings.

      Though Swiderski will soon be gone,  the individuals listed above,  as well as others,  need the support of the vast silent majority of Hastings voters.  Far too many remain either unaware or disinterested in their local government.   They must be awakened and engaged, especially now,  as the future of the waterfront and so this very village lay in the balance.   Hastings needs real public involvement,  not just small hand picked 'in house' committees.    It is as result of this village wide apathy that someone as deeply flawed and incompetent as Mayor Swiderski  could have ever remained in office for a decade.

      This concludes the final post of this page.   We owe the aforementioned  Mr.  Gonder a deep debt of gratitude.   It was his reading of a card he'd received from "Big Buck Vandeer" that first made myself and other contributors aware of the soon to be former Mayor.   We were repulsed by Swiderski's ignorance on the deer issue, and nauseated by his arrogance,  hubris,  and disturbing lack of anything approaching  real empathy.  We were struck, almost dumbfounded,  by how very little he shared in common with any of the Mayor's who preceded him,  and so we set out via YouTube videos to document Mayor Swiderski in his own words.
        Peter Swiderski's record stands for itself.   He will go down in history as the worst Mayor ever to govern the village of Hastings.   He has been nothing short of a colossal embarrassment as the face of this village.   For the first time the fire department will greet an outgoing Mayor leaving the train with horns and sirens sounding not as thank you,  but rather as a celebration that this long nightmare is finally over.
     
         Rest assured Ms. Armacost,  there will be no page dedicated to yourself as Mayor,  nor any YouTube videos documenting your handling of issues,  no matter  perceived differences.  To do so would require countless lies and  an embarrassing mountain of empty hypocritical rhetoric.   As we find Ms. Armacost to be someone comfortable in her own skin, who does not fashion herself a statesman, and one not in love with the sound of her own voice,  it is inconceivable that she, nor anyone else, could ever near anything approaching such lows.  Though an anointment of Dan Lemmons could force this page to reconsider this stance.
   
        Though it's been disturbing at times to follow and document a Mayor of such epic character defects,  the consistency with which he placed his foot in his mouth, at times hard to fathom,  became so cartoonish one couldn't help but find it comical.   There of course will never be another like him (thank God).  He truly was the gift that kept on giving.

        Keep  close guard of those secrets,  Fredo.    Regards to your kind in Bronxville.

Monday, January 5, 2015

SWIDERSKI'S THREE S'S

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxdRLqU_rZM   EPIC HYPOCRISY


"SUICIDE" - fencing of the Warburton Avenue Bridge. 

SHILLS    -  happily weaving BP into the fabric of the village, selling out the village's environmental reputation for chump change, while involved with an endless waterfront cleanup.  


SUED     -     over the village's ban of plastic bags.  A perfect example of an ego run riot.  The lawsuit the direct result of Swiderski desperate desire to be seen as trail blazer.

          In response to the embarrassment that is the anything but transparent performance of the Ivy league neutered "Mayor" of Hastings and his mediocre village manager, Francis Frobel  - There are no words more apropos then those of Ricky Roma,  Glengarry Glen Ross. 
     
    "YOU ARE PAID TO HELP US.  NOT TO, FUCK US UP!"  

For God sake let's elect someone with ETHICS, BACKBONE and while we're at it, how about something approaching anything that resembles GOOD TASTE.  The town is utterly UNDERWHELMING!!!  

Saturday, September 27, 2014

HASTINGS ON - THE SUICIDE FENCED - HUDSON




New Cropsey Painting Discovered
"View at Hastings On-Hudson Through Suicide Fencing"
                  
                   THE DISEASE THAT IS SWIDERSKI
               Or How a Mayor Destroyed an Historic View 
                and A Village's Legacy In Two Short Terms

           The glaring character defects of Hastings Mayor Peter Swiderski are once again on full display in yet another outbreak of Swiderski arrogance and duplicity.  The latest clusterfuck of his own making, the suicide fencing of the Warburton Avenue bridge.   
            When the Mayor of Hastings on Hudson receives the "news" that the County's reconstruction plans for the Warburton Avenue bridge was to include 8 foot fencing (note the term suicide prevention fencing has never been in the County's description of the fencing) which would destroy the village's spectacular signature view of the Hudson River & Palisades, one assumes A) that residents would immediately be made aware.  So that B) a concerted village wide effort could be mounted to challenge such drastic measures.  The village after all is named Hastings - on- Hudson, and the historic view in question is the very same painted by the village's most noted artist, Jasper Cropsey, who's Hastings studio, 'Ever Rest,' is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.   Cropsey is sure to be rolling over in his Sleepy Hollow grave with the knowledge that neither of the aforementioned actions were taken by the village he once called home.  It's almost unfathomable with the transformation of the waterfront now before us, revealing Cropsey's  unsullied inspiration, that the Mayor of Hastings is allowing Westchester County to impose metal "suicide" mesh to stand between the public and this most glorious of views, without anything remotely resembling a fight.   Only a man with no reverence or understanding of the village of Hastings and its artistic history would be able to allow such a thing.  
        What makes these events even more alarming is that Hastings' other signature view of the Hudson River & Palisades (descending into the downtown from "5 Corners") was destroyed by the Board of Trustees keen foresight and uncanny proclivity for BAD TASTE in allowing the erection of this colossal village eye sore that is 45 Main Street.  This monstrosity now forever blocking another vista which was an integral part of Hastings and it's landscape, a view which stood since the village's inception.  With only the historic view from the Warburton Avenue bridge remaining, one would think village opposition would have been overwhelming. Unfortunately, you can't oppose something you know nothing about.
           Mayor Swiderski had knowledge of the County's plan to suicide fence the bridge in March of 2011.  At that time, village Manager Francis Frobel responded to the County with village concerns that their plans for the bridge lacked parking meters.  That's right, parking meters.  The FENCING, soon to be SUICIDE FENCING (promoted as such by Swiderski & County legislator Mary Jane Shimsky) was a non issue.  This fencing of the bridge would not be made public until, wait for this insult  -- MAY OF 2013!!!  
           As unfathomable as these facts are, sadly they are not without precedent.  Mayor Swiderski's handling of the proposed suicide fencing mirrors to a startling degree his handling of the deer issue and his proposed sharing of Dobbs Ferry's Recreation Superintendent.  Make no mistake, the Mayor is "a gift" that truly keeps on giving.

Rec Super issue:  ring a bell?  http://replacehastingsmayorswiderski.blogspot.com/2013/04/last-hastings-wises-up-character-of.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF46eTm6Xyk

          Let's take a closer look then, at this chronic, shadowy disease, that is Swiderski.  A disease, which if nothing else, is astonishingly consistent.  
                  
          Stage 1  -  WITHHOLD INFORMATION  Decide your own course of action, or inaction, before making residents privy to what's before them. 
         Why weren't residents made aware?   Why were two valuable years squandered?  Two years which could have been used to either stop the fencing entirely or negotiate a compromise of netting beneath the bridge.  Valuable time which could have been used to preserve this breathtaking view, immortalized by Cropsey, a view which is the downtown's last remaining showcase view of the Hudson River & Palisades. How could something like this happen without an epic confrontation?   That answer is really very simple, as we've witnessed the behavior which begs such a question before.   
SUICIDE BRIDGE


         Stage 2 -  SWIDERKI FIRST  The disease always places personal/political agendas first, ahead of those of the village.  His primary concern is how an issue fits his agenda and how he is perceived.  His concerns and his fears (sincere or otherwise, my money "all in" on otherwise) are paramount and are routinely used to support and defend these agendas.  (On the issue of deer, it was the fear of Lyme disease, a disease at the time he knew little to nothing about.  He's since educated himself on the topic) http://replacehastingsmayorswiderski.blogspot.com/2010/08/swiderski-train wreck.html    


A recent Facebook thread (Sept 12) on the suicide fencing of the Warburton Avenue bridge, serving now as part of the public record thanks to the Mayor's savvy participation on the thread, is a clear example.  (note: the disease that is Swiderski has an ego which knows no bounds, it simply can't help itself, no matter prior experience in his mind he is forever the smartest guy in the room -- he don't learn much). 

Portions of pertinent discourse from this thread are highlighted and cast critical light on the shadowy disease, Swiderski.



  • Brian Allen  My issue is with both. I don't want the fence, and I have valid reasons, but others do want the fence, and they have valid reasons, tooBut no one wants Village leadership that isn't forthcoming (to state it nicely) on important issues. The Mayor says the first time plans were made public to the Board was in May of 2013.  But the County told the Village about the fence in May 2011, and the Village requested changes at that time. So they knew. Why wasn't the public told?  That bothers me. It's not just the fence - it's how it got there. It's both. It's how government operates.
  • Peter Swiderski     Bryan Allen feels this is some sort of historic failure by the Board. I categorically reject that analysis and feel quite the opposite: the “process” worked pretty well given time constraints and the Board was able to work with the County to accommodate our desire for a less intrusive fence.   Once again, I thank County Legislator and fellow resident Mary Jane Shimsky for the work she did: she truly works, and hard, for her constituents, and the volunteers who scrambled to help us.
              You may not agree that the trade-off between view and fence is worthwhile. That’s fine. However, there is no debate that fences prevent people from jumping, and there is empirical evidence that many people who are deterred from jumping do *not* go on to kill themselves via other means. The Board was unanimous in seeing the value of a fence that deters suicides. I’ve stated in the past that I am entirely comfortable with the trade-off we made on both an aesthetic and, especially, moral basis. Dwight summarizes my position succinctly. I couldn’t live with myself if we successfully fought the fence and won, and then someone jumped. Could any of you, really and truly, live with yourselves if you looked in your heart for one nanosecond and imagined the call with a distraught parent who just lost a child, explaining why you fought a fence that would have prevented it?
  • Peter Callahan Peter, I can understand your position since you're the mayor and you don't want to receive that horrible phone call. I totally get that. But it's not really about you, it's about the other 8000 residents of the village.  And I suspect that a large majority of us don't want an important view compromised in order to prevent possible jumpers from a low bridge that historically has attracted few jumpers.  Also, can you honestly say that if you were not an elected official who had to risk receiving such a phone call, but rather a private citizen with no stake in the matter, that you would still be in favor of a view-compromising fence at this location? If the answer is no, you wouldn't be, then it seems that that should be your position as mayor as well, no?  Finally, in the letter that was posted, it seems to indicate that you and the board were indeed open to, or even in favor of, no suicide fencing at all, if I read this part right:

    "We would also like to request that a design with no fencing beyond the required 42 inches also be included. While there are reasons to go with a higher fence, that has to be weighed against the view preservation and esthetic considerations that would be lost with such a larger fence. We would like a proposal that reallocates the funds that would have been otherwise spent on a higher fence and have it instead invested in fencing more in keeping with a classic Village streetscape and the River and Cropsey Foundation viewscapes visible from the bridge."

    Yet now you seem to be strongly in favor of a higher fence, and suggest that the board is as well. Can you explain either what I'm missing here, or why your position apears to have evolved on this issue?  
  • Peter Swiderski  Because I wanted to see what the response would be on an alternative from the County. It wasn't offered. And I AM an elected official who would get that call. Of course I decided it from that perspective.  I asked you and everyone else reading this - look in your heart. What would you do? Not want. Not prefer. Not think would be nicer. Nothing dryly abstract like that. Given that two human, beings jumped during your term on the Board, what would you do? Sometimes decisions are made without worrying about what others prefer or would like, but rather based on what feels right. This actually wasn`t that tough. At all. For me.
  • Brian Allen Mr. Mayor, your narrative, and that of Ms. Shimsky's office, always starts with the first County presentation to the Board, and proceeds under the threat of imminent bidding in 2014. But how do you answer my contention that you knew about this 2011, years before your story begins?
                     As to who among us could tolerate a jumper we didn't prevent, well, that question should have been posed to the public back in 2011. It is academic now, isn't it, now that you and other officials have personally made this decision, a decision which is in fact the purview of the public. This is some debate: the Village doesn't announce the destruction of the best downtown view, a view protected by law and our comprehensive plan, and then engages in moral posturing on Facebook.
  • Peter Callahan   Peter, what I would hope that you or any elected official would do, or I myself would do in your position, was have the courage to make the best decision for the community as a whole, and not base decisions on fears of receiving an unpleasant phone call. That's one part of this I'm having trouble with -- you seem be placing your own feelings above the interests of the community. I understand that sometimes leaders must make unpopular decisions, but usually/hopefully they are motivated by a larger good when they do so, and not by personal concerns about having to face grieving parents (should there ever be any), as seems the case here.
  • Brian Allen The more I contemplate the official bridge position, the more it upsets me. Are you saying that if no fence is put up, and someone jumps, that person's death is the public's fault? I will have killed someone by leaving the bridge the way it has been for 100 years? When did I and the rest of the public become responsible for suicidal people? Isn't that a matter for the public to debate? The bridge is not the shark in Jaws: the bridge does not pose a danger to anyone. Suicidal people, tragically, pose a danger to themselves. The extent to which the public should help them is up to the public, and the public should not be blamed or shamed into its policy.


Stage 3  -  ROPE A DOPE   When exposed or confronted with your less than forthcoming behavior on an issue, assume no responsibility, acknowledge no missteps, and instead misdirect with empty verbiage (the disease has long fashioned himself a writer and statesman -  another in a long list of delusions) and respond by presenting yourself as an empathetic, benevolent, innocent, a "trusted" public servant.   In other words 'act as if."
        "The process worked pretty well given the time constraints and the board was able to work with the County to accommodate our desire for a less intrusive fence." 
        Does this man ever get tired of insulting the intelligence of the residents he was elected to serve?   He squandered two years in which he submitted nor fought for any alternatives, and he has the gall to cite time constraints?  He mounted no opposition whatsoever and instead fell in lock step with the County, reversing what was his "supposed" position.  In short, he never broke a sweat.  
        "Less intrusive fencing?"   He has the balls to seek congratulations for acquiring mesh "suicide fencing" rather than chain link suicide fencing?   I've got news for The Disease and the Board of Trustees.  "Suicide fencing" is "suicide fencing," mesh or otherwise, this is not a question of aesthetics.  It will transform the Warburton bridge into a thru-way bridge, irreparably destroying the gateway to the downtown from Yonkers.  It should be noted at this juncture  -  Where in all this is the lauded Comprehensive Plan?  The Comprehensive Plan Committee or The Comprehensive Plan Implementation Committee?    This plan is useful, for what again?   Perhaps there should be a Comprehensive Plan Alert Committee.


         As Mr. Allen and Callahan point out, with mouths agape - Since when is a Mayor responsible for suicides?  This is of course ludicrous.  What Mayor has the grandiosity to state publicly that they can somehow prevent a suicide?  "Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to stop suicides by destroying the historic views from the Warburton Avenue bridge in a single mind-numbing bound!  Look, in the back room!  It's a Man!  It's a Mayor!  No  - It's the Disease!!"
        Why doesn't Swiderski create another of his "pilot programs" and erect mesh fencing along the Hudson River to prevent suicidal drownings, or secure train tracks so that those who might prefer playing footsie with third rail or walking into a choo-choo are prevented from doing so?  How on earth is the Disease able to sleep knowing efforts haven't been made to suicide proof these arenas?  As ridiculous as the Mayor's desire to fence the Warburton bridge is, it is again not without precedent. Mayor Swiderski employed a similar tactic when citing concerns over a brick dislodging itself from Building 51 and potentially striking a commuter standing on the train platform.  A building abandoned and deteriorating for decades, who's bricks never sniffed a train platform, was in fact part of the Mayor's argument for tearing down Building 51.   'Now that, is one magic brick!'  He could never live with himself if this ridiculous scenario was ever to take place either.  In this case BP played the role of the County, with Swiderski aligning himself with and sucking up to, as per usual, the powers at be.  The Mayor's relationship with BP and the waterfront cleanup is another highly questionable arena on a myriad of ethical fronts.   (an upcoming blog entry).
       Curious to note, that with as worried as the Mayor seems to be about suicides and magic falling bricks, he's surprisingly at peace with illegal/sub rosa hunting, ongoing in the Hillside woods. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcPXd0s_Kro           

         To Mr. Allen's point that the Warburton Avenue bridge is hardly "the shark in jaws."  We wholeheartedly agree.  No offense to the Warburton Avenue bridge, but if in fact the county is expecting a rash of swan dives, there are many other bridges which offer far greater drops guaranteeing passage to the beyond.  There are bridges much more attractive to jumpers, bridges with success rates far greater than fifty percent.   A bridge must first earn it's moniker of 'suicide bridge,' as the Brown Hoag Bridge in Rome N.Y has, then perhaps consideration might be given for dressing it up with suicide fencing.  Such consideration certainly does not apply to the Warburton bridge.  A bridge which has stood for over one hundred years and served as platform for only two suicide attempts, one successfully, does not a suicide bridge make.  Why then the fast track? 
        What changed?  Why did the Mayor go on record with a cursory request that there be no suicide fencing?  Mr. Callahan asked this question and I feel it important to reiterate Swiderski's response, for it's speaks volumes.   

      "Because I wanted to see what the response would be on an alternative from the County.  It wasn't offered." 
       
         That was extent to which Peter Swiderski fought for the unobstructed view from the Warburton bridge, a view which is part of Hastings' legacy.   If Dobbs Ferry or Irvington were blessed with such a view, which they're not, you can be certain their Mayors would have made their residents aware and given them every opportunity to present alternative options to preserve it, fighting with everything ounce of their being to do so. 
          The disease that is Swiderski, on the other hand, kept residents in the dark for two years and when he finally did make the threat to Hastings' irreplaceable views public, this is the extensive battle he waged -  'The county didn't offer an alternative.'   Game, set, match.   From whence the Mayor resumed waxing on about the anomaly of receiving a phantom phone call alerting him as to his responsibility for a disturbed jumper.   Say what????
           
           "Because I wanted to see what the response would be on an alternative from the County.  It wasn't offered."
        
           I have saved Mr. Callahan's response to this classic Swiderski speak for last.  Every Hastings resident should read it, then read it again, if they have any interest in understanding who Swiderski truly is.  We simply cannot applaud it enough.

      Peter Callahan -  "What does this mean exactly?  That if the county had come back with something like "If Hastings wants to skip the extra height to ward off suicides and go with 42" height, that's fine with us"  You would have said, "Great, that's what we want?" Or would you have said, "No thanks. Just asking out of curiosity.  We definitely want the higher fence?" The latter answer would beg the question of why even bother asking, inquiring about no fencing, and the former answer suggests that your present pro-fence position is a new one." 
        
             Mr. Callahan requested clarification as to this confusion on Sept 12.  Not surprisingly as of this reporting, Sept 27, there has been no response from Swiderski on the 10706 F.B. thread.

          STAGE 4  -  FLIP FLOP  Faced with opposition, back track, reverse position 180 degrees and lay the problem off, either on somebody else or circumstances beyond your control.   Expend all your energies on crafting a prepared statement, again designed to present yourself not as the duplicitous, self serving, calculating politician that you are, one riddled with deep rooted character defects  - But as a benevolent, empathetic, innocent, a "trusted" public servant.

           How then are we to make sense of a man who asks for one thing, 'no suicide fencing,' then fully embraces and can't live without the suicide fencing he didn't want in the first place?   Reviewing his forever changing positions, it clearly has little to do with all this moral posturing of fearing suicides on his watch - If this were true he would never have requested that there be no fencing.  
         There really is only one plausible answer to Mr. Callahan's question:  Swiderski never intended to seriously challenge the County.  Too much downside, he didn't want to muddy his 'political relationships,' not good for his political future down the road' (another ludicrous pipe dream of The Disease). His cursory letter to the County requesting that there be no fencing was designed to merely cover his ass.  To hell with Hastings, to hell with the view.  To fight the issue was simply not in his best interest.  
          His record to date would be comical, if it weren't now so destructive.  When the Mayor should be placing the village's welfare first and taking action, he's taken none. The Warburton Avenue Bridge is but one example.   What is to be made of his silence on the future of Reynolds Field, where the Mayor chose to play the role of Switzerland, risking carpeting with plastic the bucolic heart of the village.  Swiderski instead left the fate of Reynolds Field up to the battle of residents.  It is only thanks to the tireless efforts of Dave Skolnick and others that it's natural grass was preserved.  Swiderski could care less if the village looked just like everywhere else.  Of course what is most troubling, is our ignorance as to what the Disease is currently not doing anything about. 
         Amazingly, if this weren't enough, when Swiderski has taken action on major issues, it has been the wrong action.   The Disease has a savant like gift for forever being on the wrong side of the coin. The aforementioned issues of deer population and his proposed sharing Dobbs Ferry's Parks & Rec Super. serve as examples.    
          On each issue he has headed, he has struck out alone as the 'can do politician,' setting in motion his desire for a 'pilot program,' and of course (as with the bridge) doing so without full knowledge of residents.   (The Disease is yet to meet a pilot program he didn't salivate over).   Then, when confronted with the heat from disgruntled residents, who's reaction he routinely misjudges an underestimates, the Disease will promptly reverse his prior position.   Both these issues mimic stage for stage the characteristics of the Disease outlined above.   There is not an issue this man can't be moved off of, if it appears advantageous to what he perceives to be his public image.   He is but a shape-shifter, a people pleaser.  He is, the ultimate victim of self.
        
          The following is a portion of the letter Mayor Swiderski wrote to County Legislator Mary Jane Shimsky, shockingly a Hastings resident herself, on July 9, 2013.   It is a portion of the same letter Mr. Callahan referenced and did not include in his Facebook discourse with The Disease.  
         As you read this, ask yourself,  what does the man portraying the Mayor of Hastings stand for?  Tell me, I beg you.  Who is he?  
           
          FLIP  -    "We feel very strongly that "view preservation" from the Warburton Avenue Bridge to the Hudson River is integral to the essence of the character of the village.  As we develop the waterfront this view will only grow in importance." 
        
          FLOP -    "I AM an elected official who would get that call.   Of course I decided it from that perspective." 
          A perspective which places the anomaly of a suicide jumper before the interest of 8,000 village residents.  What happened to those "strong feelings," about the 'integral essence of the character of the village?'  Way to dig in.
           
         FLIP  - (on deer slaughter)  "There's been surprisingly little resistance from the community, a couple of cranky emails." "The town has simply rolled over on the issue." I'm saying we're doing this no matter what." 

        FLOP  -   "It was far too brutal, too divisive, it was clear the village would never accept it."   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3whZlgHX_4s
   
        What are we to make of a man who pursues with every once of his being a net & bolt permit, never issued in the history of NY state, one who stated in an email that he'd like to "kill all the deer" and was "proud to be a pilot program for the state" for this barbaric slaughter -  Who is now running what is tantamount to a village wide birth control clinic for does.   Say what????   
        Is this really the man the village wants representing Hastings in negotiations with BP over the future of the waterfront?   This hardly seems a fair fight.
"SIT HERE AND HOLD OUT YOUR HAND"

      In Closing   -   This blog has doggedly chronicled the Hastings Mayor's performance for years now, and recognized long ago, that Peter Swiderski is not a Hastings Mayor. He is but a wanna be politician, and a terrible one at that.  He has shown time and time again to have his finger on everything, but, the pulse of the village.   He is a man who knows what the words are with which to describe the essence of Hastings, but these words and his voice are truly empty.  For you cannot transmit something that you haven't got.   Sadly for Swiderski, Hastings is but a concept.  Review his record, re read his syrupy village missives, study him closely as we have.   He is a man who's merely relocated to Hastings, but who's real sensibilities, sensibilities and ethics which have no business here, have never left Bronxville. 
        
         For if Mayor Swiderski truly knew what Hastings was, if the village truly lived in him, he would have known what the view from the Warburton Avenue bridge means to the village. If what he wrote of in his letter to Legislator Shimsky about the 'essence of Hastings' were not just mere words, he would have acted upon those words.  He would have known what was at stake.   He does not.  

        If he truly knew what Hastings was, he would never have proposed that Hastings share Dobbs Ferry's Rec. Superintendent, he would have known how important the Rec Department staff and their relationship with residents is to the identity of the village.   He does not.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g567iAA6YLw#t=93

       If he truly knew what Hastings was, he could never have remained silent on Reynolds Field, because he would have known how important that field is to the village's essence, an essence he can only give lip service.   He does not.

       
       If he truly knew what Hastings was, and what residents of Hastings could accept, he would never in a million years have ever considered seeking a net & bolt permit to slaughter deer.  And would never think of misrepresenting residents as being behind and supporting such barbarism without their knowledge.   He does not.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bylrqOU2DCg

         
       If he truly knew what Hastings was, there would be no BP scoreboard standing in Uniontown Field. He wouldn't be weaving BP into the fabric of the village and compromising our environmentally conscious reputation, reducing the village to mere shills for B.P.'s greenwashing efforts.   He does not.

          
        If Mayor Peter Swiderski truly understood the village he's been elected to represent, if it truly did live in him, he would understand that the attraction of the village has always been it's people, not it's politicians.   Individuals, unique individuals, unlike himself, in whom the town does truly live.  They are and have always been it's most valuable resource.  They are and have always been, it's true art and blessing.   Individuals like, Peter Callahan, Brian Allen and Patrick Randolph Bell.  They are each refreshing throwbacks, who embody what made this the unique village it once was and can be again.   And it is they, and their authentic understanding and passion for what this village is, that offers us a glimmer of hope in moving forward and ridding ourselves of the chronic disease, that is Swiderski.

           The good and bad news for Hastings is, Swiderski's finally out of Flip Flops.  He has painted himself, behind mesh fencing, into a corner from which he can't escape.   He cannot "shield the people from where the bad things will happen," as was the initial plan in his dream of village wide slaughter of deer.  For this time, the 'bad thing,' the suicide fencing of the Warburton bridge and it's saga, stands in full view for all to marvel at, in disgust, forever.  This view of the Hudson through suicide fencing, this rape of Hastings' artistic legacy will stand as testament to Swiderski and his contribution to the village.  
         Despite Swiderski's concerns, the bridge's fencing is certain to go down in history as platform for one final suicide -   Ironically, the political suicide of it's Mayor.

           It's good to know that with suicide fencing in place the Mayor can now live with himself.   The real question that remains to be answered in March however -- Is can Hastings afford any longer to live with him?  

Peace, our apologies
God bless Jasper Cropsey